Abstract
Objective: Develop and validate a surgical wound assessment tool for the Vietnamese nurses.
Material and methods: The SWAT was developed in three phases. Phase I: developed an initial SWAT based on international evidence-based guidelines and a comprehensive literature review, Vietnamese surgeons then evaluated the initial SWAT. Phase II: wound care nurse experts in Vietnam used an interactive Delphi process to refine and develop a final version of the SWAT. Phase III: the final version of the SWAT was then evaluated among 260 surgical patients to validate its construct validity and inter - ratter reliability.
Results: Phase I: The overall scale-content validity index was 0.98. The SWAT included 30 items. Phase II: six out of 30 items were excluded from the tool. Phase III: results of the Exploratory Factor Ananysis supported a threecomponent structure of the SWAT. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient value of the overall scale was 0.81 (95% CI 0.68 - 0.89, p < 0.001), confirming excellent inter - rater reliability.
Conclusion: The SWAT is a reliable and valid tool for monitoring and evaluation the status of surgical wound healing and detecting early factors that may increase surgical wound complications.
References
World Union of Wound Healing Societies. Consensus
Document. Closed surgical incision management:
understanding the role of NPWT. Wounds International
[cited 2016 September]; Available from: http://www.
wuwhs2016.com/files/WUWHS_SI_consensus_Web.pdf.
World Health Organization. Global Guidelines for the
Prevention of Surgical Site Infection. 2016; Available
from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/ 250680/1/
-eng.pdf?ua=1.
Thu LTA, Hung NV, Quang NN et al. A point-prevalence
study on healthcare- associated infections in Vietnam:
Public health implications. Infection Control and Hospital
Epidemiology. 2011. 32(10): 1039-1041.
Do HTT, Finlayson K, Edwards H. Surgical wound
assessment in Vietnam: a think-aloud technique and interview
analysis. Journal of Wound Care. 2020. 29(4): 4-13.
Do TTH, Development and validation of a surgical wound
assessment tool for use in Vietnam. 2019, Queensland
University of Technology.
Canadian Association of Wound Care. Best Practice
Recommendations for the Prevention and Management
of Surgical Wound Complications. 2017 2017/02/14];
Availablefrom:https://www.woundscanada.ca/docman/
public/554-bpr-prevention-and-management-of-surgicalwound - complications/file.
Wounds Australia, Standards for Wound Prevention and
Management. 2016, Cambridge Media: Osborne Park, WA.
Korol E, Johnston K, Waser N, et al. A systematic review of
risk factors associated with surgical site infections among
surgical patients. PloS one. 2013. 8(12): e83743.
Han JY, Choi-Kwon S. Adaptation of evidence-based
surgical wound care algorithm. Journal of Korean Academy
of Nursing. 2011. 41(6): 768-79.
Koo TK, Li MY. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting
Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.
Journal of Chiropractic Medicine. 2016. 15(2): 155-163.
Published | 05-01-2025 | |
Fulltext |
|
|
Language |
|
|
Issue | No. 79 (2022) | |
Section | Original article | |
DOI | 10.38103/jcmhch.79.8 | |
Keywords |

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Clinical Medicine Hue Central Hospital