Analgesic efficacy of intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural analgesia in laboring parturients
Original article | Vol. 18 No. 1 (2026)
Journal of Clinical Medicine Hue Central Hospital, Vol. 18 No. 1 (2026)
Original article

Analgesic efficacy of intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural analgesia in laboring parturients

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Fulltext

HTML (Tiếng Việt)     209    75
PDF (Tiếng Việt)     209    72
Man, L. D. T., Kiet, T. T., Nhu, B. A. Q., & Phan Thang. (2026). Analgesic efficacy of intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural analgesia in laboring parturients. Journal of Clinical Medicine Hue Central Hospital, 18(1), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.38103/jcmhch.18.1.10
HTML (Tiếng Việt)     209    75
PDF (Tiếng Việt)     209    72
DOI: 10.38103/jcmhch.18.1.10
10.38103/jcmhch.18.1.10
Le Dinh Tra Man
Tao Tuan Kiet
Bui Ai Quynh Nhu
Phan Thang
Trường Đại học y dược, Đại học Huế
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3380-1088

Abstract

Background: Intermittent epidural bolus (IEB) is an effective technique for labor analgesia and has been increasingly adopted in recent years. By improving the distribution of local anesthetics within the epidural space, IEB enhances sensory block, minimizes motor blockade, and reduces the need for rescue boluses compared with continuous epidural infusion (CEI). This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of intermittent epidural bolus compared with continuous epidural infusion of ropivacaine for labor analgesia.

Methods: A prospective, randomized comparativestudy was conducted on 90 parturients receiving epidural labor analgesia, who were assigned to either continuous epidural infusion group (CEI) n=45 and the intermittent epidural bolus group (IEB) n=45 of ropivacaine 0,1% combined with fentanyl 2 µg/mL for vaginal delivery at Tu Du Hospital from May2023 to May 2024.

Results: No statistically significant differences were observed in baseline maternal and obstetric characteristics between the two study groups. In the IEB group, VAS pain scores at all time points were lower than those in the CEI group (p < 0,05). In the CEI group, the proportion of patients with VAS scores > 3 was 55,6%, which was significantly higher than the 6,7% observed in the IEB group (p < 0,001). The number of rescue bolus administrations and the frequency of healthcare staff interventions were also higher in the CEI group compared with the IEB group (p < 0,01). The mean hourly consumption of local anesthetic in the CEI group was 13,7 mg, which was higher than 10,8 mg in the IEB group (p < 0,001). No patients in the IEB group experienced motor blockade, whereas six patients in the CEI group did (p < 0,05). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in maternal satisfaction, adverse effects, or neonatal Apgar scores.

Conclusion: IEB administration for labor analgesia provides superior analgesic efficacy, reduces motor blockade, and decreases total local anesthetic consumption compared with continuous epidural infusion.

Keywords:  Epidural analgesia, labor analgesia, intermittent bolus, continuous infusion
🔒

Nội dung dành cho thành viên

Vui lòng đăng nhập để đọc toàn văn bài báo và tải tệp PDF.
Nếu bạn chưa có tài khoản, hãy đăng ký miễn phí.

Đăng ký
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Clinical Medicine Hue Central Hospital