Downloads
Abstract
Objectives: To analyze the clinical and radiographic features of impacted M3M and compare the treatment outcomes of two groups which underwent tooth extraction surgery using and without Piezotome
Methods: Subject and Method: Prospective study, clinical intervention with splitmouth design on 32 patients with bilaterally M3Ms having the same level of difficulty in extraction according to Pederson’s difficulty classification modified by Mai Dinh Hung. Results were assessed 1 day, 3 days, and 7 days following surgery.
Results: The mean surgical time was longer in the group that used Piezotome than in the group that did not use it. The degree of swelling and pain in the group of surgical patients who were treated using Piezotome on the 1st and 3rd day after surgery was lower. The degree of trismus was less in the group of surgical patients who were undergone Piezotome on the 1st, 3rd and 7th day after surgery. Complications are rare, which mostly occured in the group of surgical patients who were not used Piezotome. The group of patients who underwent surgery using Piezotome had better postoperative results than the group being used conventional methods of drilling.
Conclusion: Besides the ability to reduce swelling, pain, improve mouth opening after surgery, Piezotome also reduces the rate of sequelae and complications after surgery despite the longer surgery time.
References
Chang HH, Lee MS, Hsu YC, Tsai SJ, Lin CP. Comparison of clinical parameters and environmental noise levels between regular surgery and piezosurgery for extraction of impacted third molars. J Formos Med Assoc. 2015;114:929-35.
Lánh LĐ. Phẫu thuật miệng - Tập 2. Nhà xuất bản Y học chi nhánh Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh; 2012:87-136.
Mercier P, Precious D. Risks and benefits of removal of impacted third molars: A critical review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992;21:17-27.
Lánh LĐ. Phẫu thuật miệng - Tập 1. Nhà xuất bản Y học chi nhánh Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh; 2011:37-191.
Jakse N, Bankaoglu V, Wimmer G, Eskici A, Pertl C. Primary wound healing after lower third molar surgery: evaluation of 2 different flap designs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002;93:7-12.
Rullo R, Addabbo F, Papaccio G, D’Aquino R, Festa VM. Piezoelectric device vs. conventional rotative instruments in impacted third molar surgery: relationships between surgical difficulty and postoperative pain with histological evaluations. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013;41:e33-8.
Mantovani E, Arduino PG, Schierano G, Ferrero L, Gallesio G, Mozzati M, et al. A split-mouth randomized clinical trial to evaluate the performance of piezosurgery compared with traditional technique in lower wisdom tooth removal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;72:1890-7.
Lago-Méndez L, Diniz-Freitas M, Senra-Rivera C, Gude-Sampedro F, Rey JMG, García-García A. Relationships between surgical difficulty and postoperative pain in lower third molar extractions. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65:979-983.
Kerawala CJ, Martin IC, Allan W, Williams ED. The effects of operator technique and bur design on temperature during osseous preparation for osteosynthesis self-tapping screws. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999;88:145-50.
Vercellotti T, Nevins ML, Kim DM, Nevins M, Wada K, Schenk RK, et al. Osseous response following resective therapy with piezosurgery. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2005;25:543-9.
Patil C, Jadhav A, K R, Bhola N, Borle RM, Mishra A. Piezosurgery vs bur in impacted mandibular third molar surgery: Evaluation of postoperative sequelae. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2019;9:259-262.
Rajan J, Kamath AT, Gadicherla S, Bhagania M, Pentapati KC. Application of Piezosurgery in Surgical Extraction of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars Versus Conventional Rotatory Technique: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada. 2019;19:1-10.
Kirli Topcu SI, Palancioglu A, Yaltirik M, Koray M. Piezoelectric Surgery Versus Conventional Osteotomy in Impacted Lower Third Molar Extraction: Evaluation of Perioperative Anxiety, Pain, and Paresthesia. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;77:471-477.
Mariotti. Ultrasonic Bone Surgery System UNIKO PZ Operation Manual. 2021.
Tùng KT. Hiệu quả phẫu thuật nhổ răng khôn hàm dưới mọc lệch ngầm theo Parant II có sử dụng máy siêu âm piezotome. Đại học Y Hà Nội; 2017.
Khởi NM, Uyên TL, Mai TTH, Trung TH, Khuê TN. Nghiên cứu đặc điểm lâm sàng, X-quang và đánh giá kết quả điều trị bệnh nhân có răng khôn hàm dưới mọc lệch được phẫu thuật bằng Piezotome và tay khoan quay. Tạp chí Y dược học Cần Thơ. 2019;22-23-24-25:1-7.
Arakji H, Shokry M, Aboelsaad N. Comparison of Piezosurgery and Conventional Rotary Instruments for Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: A Randomized Controlled Clinical and Radiographic Trial. Int J Dent. 2016;2016:8169356.
Bhati B, Kukreja P, Kumar S, Rathi VC, Singh K, Bansal S. Piezosurgery versus Rotatory Osteotomy in Mandibular Impacted Third Molar Extraction. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2017;7:5-10.
Sortino F, Pedulla E, Masoli V. The piezoelectric and rotatory osteotomy technique in impacted third molar surgery: comparison of postoperative recovery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66:2444-8.
Sharma AK, Gupta A, Pabari HP, Pathak SK, Odedra NH, Beniwal J, et al. Comparative and clinical evaluation between piezoelectric and conventional rotary techniques for mandibular impacted third molar extraction. 2022.
Barone A, Marconcini S, Giacomelli L, Rispoli L, Calvo JL, Covani U. A Randomized Clinical Evaluation of Ultrasound Bone Surgery Versus Traditional Rotary Instruments in Lower Third Molar Extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68:330-336.
Srivastava P, Shetty P, Shetty S. Comparison of Surgical Outcome after Impacted Third Molar Surgery Using Piezotome and a Conventional Rotary Handpiece. Contemp Clin Dent. 2018;9:S318-S324.
| Published | 20-01-2023 | |
| Fulltext |
|
|
| Language |
|
|
| Issue | No. 84 (2023) | |
| Section | Original article | |
| DOI | 10.38103/jcmhch.84.18 | |
| Keywords | Phẫu thuật siêu âm, răng khôn hàm dưới, răng mọc lệch ngầm Piezotome, mandibular third molar, impacted teeth |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Clinical Medicine Hue Central Hospital