Abstract
Background: Periampullary carcinoma arises within a radius of 2cm of great duodenal papilla, including ampulla of Vater, the end of common bile duct, head of the pancreas, and the duodenum around ampulla of Vater. There were many imagingmodalities to
diagnose ampulla of Vater and periampullary carcinoma, such as abdominal ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, transendoscopic ultrasound. This study aims to compare the MRI characteristics of ampulla of Vater and periampullary carcinoma
Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 16 patients with ampulla of Vater cancer and 12 patients with periampullary cancer who wereadmitted at Binh Dan hospital in Ho Chi Minh City between January 2019 and July 2021. All patients were
performed with a 1.5 Tesla MRI machine (GE’s Signa HDx machine) at the Diagnostic Imaging Department of Binh Dan Hospital.
Results: The ampulla of Vater tumor had a smaller size than that in periampullary tumors (p < 0.001). The distance from the end of dilated bile duct and dilated pancreatic duct to large duodenal papillawere smaller in ampulla of Vater as compared with those
in periampullary cancer (p < 0.05). The angle formed by bile ductand pancreatic duct was smaller in ampulla of Vater than in periampullary cancer (p < 0.001). Pancreatic duct diameter in ampulla of Vater was smaller than that in periampullary cancer (p <
0.05). The four - segment sign wasspecific for pancreatic head cancer. The three - segment sign was not seen in ampullary of Vater. The ampulla of Vater protruding into the duodenum suggested ampulla of Vater cancer.
Conclusion: Magnetic resonance is a good imaging modality for differential diagnosis of ampulla of Vater and periampullary cancer
References
Nikolaidis P, Hammond NA, Day K, Yaghmai V, Wood III CG, Mosbach DS, et al. Imaging features of benign and malignant ampullary and periampullary lesions. Radiographics. 2014. 34: 624-641.
Holzheimer RG , Mannick JA. Surgical treatment: evidence-based and problem-oriented. 2001.
Sommerville C, Limongelli P, Pai M, Ahmad R, Stamp G, Habib N, et al. Survival analysis after pancreatic resection for ampullary and pancreatic head carcinoma: an analysis of clinicopathological factors. Journal of surgical oncology. 2009. 100: 651-656.
Vilhordo DW, Gregório C, Valentini DF, Edelweiss MIA, Uchoa DM, Osvaldt AB. Prognostic factors of longterm survival following radical resection for ampullary carcinoma. Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer. 2020: 1-10.
Ray - Offor E. Periampullary cancer and cancer in head of pancreas: what is the difference? Gastroenterol Hepatol Endosc. 2019. 4: 1-3.
Wu DS, Chen WX, Wang XD, Acharya R, Jiang XH. Pancreaticobiliary duct changes of periampullary carcinomas: quantitative analysis at MR imaging. European journal of radiology. 2012. 81: 2112-2117.
Kim JH, Kim MJ, Chung JJ, Lee WJ, Yoo HS, Lee JT. Differential diagnosis of periampullary carcinomas at MR imaging. Radiographics. 2002. 22: 1335-52.
Chung YE, Kim M-J, Kim HM, Park M-S, Choi J-Y, Hong H-S, et al. Differentiation of benign and malignant ampullary obstructions on MR imaging. European journal of radiology. 2011. 80: 198-203
Published | 09-01-2025 | |
Fulltext |
|
|
Language |
|
|
Issue | No. 77 (2022) | |
Section | Original article | |
DOI | 10.38103/jcmhch.77.1 | |
Keywords | Cộng hưởng từ, bóng Vater, đầu tụy, ung thư Magnetic resonance, ampulla of Vater, pancreatic head, cancer |

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Clinical Medicine Hue Central Hospital