A REPORT OF LAPAROSCOPIC PROMONTOFIXATION WITH UTERINE PRESERVATION

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
PDF (Tiếng Việt)     1    0

Abstract

Background: Pelvic organ prolapse is a common disease, accounting for 31.8% to 97.7% of women at clinical examination, of which clinical symptoms account for 2.9% to 11.4%. Pelvic floor disorders, including urinary incontinence, anal incontinence, and genital prolapse, are highly prevalent, affecting approximately one-third of adult women. While these conditions are not life-threatening, their social and economic consequences may be significant. Nowadays, there are many methods to treat female pelvic prolapse including laparoscopic surgery, laparotomy and vaginal surgery. Choosing a method of treating pelvic organ prolapse is still controversial. Endoscopic surgery is a method having many advantages. In this study, we reported the treatment results for Pelvic organ prolapse by laparoscopic promontofixation without hysterectomy.

Methods: A study was conducted on 19 female patients with pelvic organ prolapse, who were treated with the laparoscopy promontofixation for uterin preservation at Hue Central Hospital from June 2019 to June 2021.

Results: The average age was 65 years olds, the rate of hard work is 77.8%, and the average number of births was 3.8. The rate of macrosomia is 28%. The rate of bladder prolapse stage 2 accounted for 42%, and bladder prolapse stage 3 accounted for the highest rate of 58%. The rate of stage 2 cervical prolapse was 32%, of which stage 3 cervical prolapse accounted for the highest rate of 68%. The rate of stage 1 rectal prolapse was 50%, and the rate of stage 2 rectal prolapse was 1%, of which stage 3 was 42%. The rate of urinary incontinence was 89%. The median hospital stay for surgery was 6.57 days. The average time for laparoscopic promontofixation was 142 minutes, of which the longest time was 180 minutes and the fastest was 60 minutes. There were no complications during surgery. Complications appear after surgery: Burning pain in the lower abdomen was highest at 44%, dull pain in the low back 33%, constipation 22%, cystitis 11%, pain when defecating 11%. The success rate of the treatment of bladder prolapse after surgery was 100%, the success rate of cervical prolapse was 87.5%, the success rate of rectal prolapse was 88.9%. The rate of no urinary incontinence after 12 months was 75%, the success rate of dysuria treatment was 100%.

Conclusions: Our initial experience renders the use of the laparoscopic promontofixation with uterine preservation to be safe and efficient in experienced hands. However, it is difficult to performe this technique, the number of samples is little and we need to have further research.

https://doi.org/10.38103/jcmhch.79.14%20

References

Antoine T, Kayembe, Andy M, Muela, Alex M, Baleka,

Dieudonné S, Mushengezi, Rahma R, Tozin. Genital

prolapse: epidemiology, clinic and therapeutic at Saint

Joseph Hospital of Kinshasa. PAMJ. 2020. 37.

Nguyễn Văn Ân VTTP, Phạm Hữu Đoàn. áp dụng phẫu

thuật nội soi treo âm đạo vào mỏm nhô để điều trị sa sinh

dục nặng. Y Học TP. Hồ Chí Minh. 2014. 18: 428-429.

Nguyễn Bá Mỹ Nhi, Phan Thị Nga, Văn Phụng Thống.

Nhận xét bước đầu sử dụng mảnh ghép tổng hợp trong điều

trị ngoại khoa bệnh lý sa tạng chậu nữ tại bệnh viện Từ Dũ.

Tạp chí phụ sản. 2012. 10: 228-236.

Baden WF, Walker TA, Lindsey JH. The vaginal profile.

Tex Med. 1968. 64: 56-8.

Huebner M, DeLancey JOL, Reisenauer C, Brucker SY,

Preibsch H, Fleischer S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging

of vaginal support structure before and after Vecchietti

procedure in women with Mayer-Rokitansky-KüsterHauser syndrome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018. 97:

-837.

Ingelman-Sundberg A. Urinary incontinence in women,

excluding fistulas. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1952. 31:

-91.

Mustafa S, Amit A, Filmar S, Deutsch M, Netzer I,

Itskovitz-Eldor J, et al. Implementation of laparoscopic

sacrocolpopexy: establishment of a learning curve and

short-term outcomes. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012. 286:

-8.

Cosson M, Bogaert E, Narducci F, Querleu D, Crépin

G. [Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy: short-term results

and complications in 83 patients]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol

Reprod (Paris). 2000. 29: 746-750.

Agarwala N, Hasiak N, Shade M. Laparoscopic sacral

colpopexy with Gynemesh as graft material - experience

and results. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007. 14: 577-83.

Antiphon P, Elard S, Benyoussef A, Fofana M, Yiou

R, Gettman M, et al. Laparoscopic promontory sacral

colpopexy: is the posterior, recto-vaginal, mesh mandatory?

Eur Urol. 2004. 45: 655-61.

North CE, Ali - Ross NS, Smith AR, Reid FM. A prospective

study of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the management

of pelvic organ prolapse. Bjog. 2009. 116: 1251-7.

Moez K JD, Monia F, Fethi Z, La double promontofixation

coelioscopique : un échec pour l’étage postérieur ? Vol. 94.

: LA TUNISIE MEDICALE

Rozet F, Mandron E, Arroyo C, Andrews H, Cathelineau X,

Mombet A, et al. Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy approach

for genito-urinary prolapse: experience with 363 cases. Eur

Urol. 2005. 47: 230-6.

Bui C, Ballester M, Chéreau E, Guillo E, Daraï E. [Functional results and quality of life of laparoscopic

promontofixation in the cure of genital prolapse]. Gynecol

Obstet Fertil. 2010. 38: 563-8.

Claerhout F, Roovers JP, Lewi P, Verguts J, De Ridder D,

Deprest J. Implementation of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy-

-a single centre’s experience. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor

Dysfunct. 2009. 20: 1119-25.

Ross JW, Preston M. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for

severe vaginal vault prolapse: five - year outcome. J Minim

Invasive Gynecol. 2005. 12: 221-6.

Sarlos D, Brandner S, Kots L, Gygax N, Schaer G.

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for uterine and post -

hysterectomy prolapse: anatomical results, quality of life

and perioperative outcome-a prospective study with 101

cases. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008. 19:

-22.

Ganatra AM, Rozet F, Sanchez-Salas R, Barret E, Galiano

M, Cathelineau X, et al. The current status of laparoscopic

sacrocolpopexy: a review. Eur Urol. 2009. 55: 1089-103.

x P, Ercoli A, Salet - Lizée D, Cotelle O, Bolner B, Van

Den Akker M, et al. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with two

separate meshes along the anterior and posterior vaginal

walls for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse. J Am

Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2004. 11: 29-35.

Higgs PJ, Chua HL, Smith AR. Long term review of

laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Bjog. 2005. 112: 1134-8.

Rivoire C, Botchorishvili R, Canis M, Jardon K,

Rabischong B, Wattiez A, et al. Complete laparoscopic

treatment of genital prolapse with meshes including vaginal

promontofixation and anterior repair: a series of 138

patients. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007. 14: 712-8.

Acsinte OM, Rabischong B, Bourdel N, Canis M,

Botchorishvili R. Laparoscopic Promontofixation in 10

Steps. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018. 25: 767.

Nguyễn TVT, Nguyễn BMN, Vũ AT. Phân tích các biến

chứng phẫu thuật đặt mảnh ghép điều trị sa tạng chậu trong

thời gian theo dõi 2 năm. Tạp chí Phụ sản. 2018. 16: 107 -

Published 05-01-2025
Fulltext
PDF (Tiếng Việt)     1    0
Language
Issue No. 79 (2022)
Section Case report
DOI 10.38103/jcmhch.79.14
Keywords

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Clinical Medicine Hue Central Hospital

Hoang, T. N. (2025). A REPORT OF LAPAROSCOPIC PROMONTOFIXATION WITH UTERINE PRESERVATION. Journal of Clinical Medicine Hue Central Hospital, (79). https://doi.org/10.38103/jcmhch.79.14