Prognostic accuracy of mpriest for adverse outcomes within 30 days of hospitalized covid-19 patients in Ho Chi Minh city

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
PDF (Tiếng Việt)     83    32

Abstract

Objectives: The need for a simple yet effective tool to predict the severity of COVID-19 patients is essential. The mPRIEST score has been applied in some countries and contributed to solving the problem of health resourceallocation. We aimed to investigate the prognostic accuracy of mPRIEST for adverse outcome of hospitalized COVID-19 patients in the Vietnamese population.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study of hospitalized COVID-19 patients at the Emergency Department in the University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City during the period from April 2021 to January 2022. We collected data from the electronic medical record system, the information of variables at the time of admission to assess the mPRIREST score value. We used 30-day outcome data (death or receiving respiratory, cardiovascular or renal support) to determine the prognostic accuracy for adverse outcomes of the mPRIEST score.

Results: We analysed data of 339 adults, of whom 142 (41.9%) died or got organ support. Out of the 90 patients who died, 88 (97.8%) received at least one organ support. C-statistics (AUC) of the mPRIEST score for the overall outcome, death and organ support was 0.77 (95% CI 0.72 - 0.82); 0.72 (CI 95% 0.66 - 0.78); and 0.77 (95% CI 0.72 - 0.82), respectively. A cut - off > 9 points for a sensitivity of 65.5% and a specificity of 75.1%.

Conclusion: This data suggests that the mPRIEST score, which can be assessed from clinical variables alone, has potential for use in Emergency Department to predict mortality or organ support within 30 - day of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. This should be confirmed in more validation studies in diverse settings.

https://doi.org/10.38103/jcmhch.90.6%20

References

Thomas B, Goodacre S, Lee E, Sutton L, Bursnall M, Loban A, et al. Prognostic accuracy of emergency department triage tools for adults with suspected COVID-19: the PRIEST observational cohort study. Emergency Medicine Journal. 2021; 38(8): 587-593.

Goodacre S, Thomas B, Sutton L, Burnsall M, Lee E, Bradburn M, et al. Derivation and validation of a clinical severity score for acutely ill adults with suspected COVID-19: The PRIEST observational cohort study. PloS one. 2021; 16(1): e0245840.

Suh EH, Lang KJ, Zerihun LM. Modified PRIEST score for identification of very low-risk COVID patients. The American journal of emergency medicine. 2021; 47: 213-216.

Physicians ACoE. Emergency Department COVID-19 Management Tool. 2021.

Bộ Y Tế Việt Nam. Quyết định về việc ban hành Hướng dẫn chẩn đoán và điều trị COVID-19. Quyết định số 250/ QĐ-BYT ngày 28 tháng 01 năm 2022. 2022.

Peckham H, de Gruijter NM, Raine C, Radziszewska A, Ciurtin C, Wedderburn LR, et al. Male sex identified by global COVID-19 meta-analysis as a risk factor for death and ITU admission. Nature communications. 2020; 11(1): 6317.

Ikram AS, Pillay S. Admission vital signs as predictors of COVID-19 mortality: a retrospective cross - sectional study. BMC Emergency Medicine. 2022; 22(1): 1-10.

Published 28-12-2024
Fulltext
PDF (Tiếng Việt)     83    32
Language
Issue No. 90 (2023)
Section Original article
DOI 10.38103/jcmhch.90.6
Keywords mPRIEST, COVID-19. mPRIEST, COVID-19.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Clinical Medicine Hue Central Hospital

Duy, D. N. Q., & Tran Ngoc Nguyen, Tran Phuc An, Dang Huy Hoang, Tran Nien Ky, Phan Hai Nam, To Thi Ngan, Ninh Hoang Phong, Pham Thi Thao, Vo Ngoc Trang, Pham Ngoc Huy, Van Trinh Ngoc Khanh, Quy Khoa, Nguyen Thi Xuan Dieu, Nguyen Tuan Anh. (2024). Prognostic accuracy of mpriest for adverse outcomes within 30 days of hospitalized covid-19 patients in Ho Chi Minh city. Journal of Clinical Medicine Hue Central Hospital, (90), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.38103/jcmhch.90.6