Downloads
Abstract
Background: The optimal position of the implant in 3 dimensions in space is the most important factor to ensure the long - term success of dental implants. Today, advanced technology can simulate the virtual implant position before surgery. Through 3D printing technology, it is possible to transfer the virtual implant position to the surgical field using a static surgical guide. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of 3D printed surgical guides when performing implant when performed using 3D printed surgical guides.
Methods: The study reports a series of clinical cases with 32 implants placed in the maxilla and mandible. The surgical guide is designed using Blue Sky Implant software. Postoperative CBCT data is combined with preoperative treatment plan data to evaluate deviations in implant position, angle between two implants, and vertical deviation.
Results: The study showed implant misalignment when using 3D printed surgical guides: misalignment at the implant neck was 1.11 ± 0.67 mm; at the tip is 1.43 ± 1.053 mm; The angle is 3.01 ± 2.53o and the vertical is 0.71 ± 0.57 mm. The study noted that angular deviations, cervical, apical and vertical deviations were not statistically significant according to gender, parts of dental archs and implant position.
Conclusion: Using a surgical guide can help the implant to be placed more accurately in all 3 dimensions in the maxilla/ mandible. The 3D printed surgical guide has high precision and can be used to support implant surgery
References
Braut V, Bornstein MM, Kuchler U, et al. Bone dimensions in the posterior mandible: a retrospective radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography. Part 2 - analysis of edentulous sites. 2014;34(5):639-47.
Quân TĐ, So sánh hai hệ thống máng hướng dẫn phẫu thuật: in 3d và thủ công trong cấy ghép nha khoa răng trước hàm trên. 2019, Luận văn Thạc sĩ, Đại học Y Dược Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh.
Geng W, Liu C, Su Y, et al. Accuracy of different types of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing surgical guides for dental implant placement. 2015; 8(6):8442.
Misch CEJID. Contemporary implant dentistry. 1999; 8(1):90.
Đàm Văn V, Nghiên cứu điều trị mất răng hàm trên từng phần bằng kỹ thuật implant có ghép xương. 2013.
De Souza AB, Kang M, Negreiros WM, et al. A comparative retrospective study of different surgical guide designs for static computer‐assisted implant surgery in posterior single edentulous sites. 2022;33(1):45-52.
Demirkol N, Demirkol M. A retrospective analysis of anterior single dental implants. 2019.
Phạm Hoài Thu, Đỗ Thị Thúy, Nguyễn Văn Hùng. Nghiên cứu áp dụng bộ câu hỏi SF - 36 trong đánh giá chất lượng cuộc sống bệnh nhân viêm khớp dạng. Tạp chí nghiên cứu y học. 2017;106(1):146-150.
Gültekin A, Şirali A, Gültekin P, et al. Clinical evaluation of the stability of implants placed at different supracrestal levels. 2016;50(3):21-31.
Schnutenhaus S, Brunken L, Edelmann C, et al. Alveolar ridge preservation and primary stability as influencing factors on the transfer accuracy of static guided implant placement: a prospective clinical trial. 2020;20:1-11.
Smitkarn P, Subbalekha K, Mattheos N, et al. The accuracy of single‐tooth implants placed using fully digital‐guided surgery and freehand implant surgery. 2019;46(9):949-957.
El Kholy K, Lazarin R, Janner SF, et al. Influence of surgical guide support and implant site location on accuracy of static Computer‐Assisted Implant Surgery. 2019;30(11):1067-1075.
| Published | 26-12-2024 | |
| Fulltext |
|
|
| Language |
|
|
| Issue | No. 92 (2023) | |
| Section | Original article | |
| DOI | 10.38103/jcmhch.92.9 | |
| Keywords | Surgical guide, 3D, dental implants. |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Clinical Medicine Hue Central Hospital