Laparoscopic sigmoid colon vaginoplasty in patients wih Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
PDF (Tiếng Việt)     30    9

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the technical feasibility and anatomical and functional outcomes of laparoscopic sigmoid colon vaginoplasty in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome

Methods: A total of 5 patients with MRKH syndrome was treated at our hospital from February 2017 to June 2018. Laparoscopic sigmoid colon vaginoplasty was perfomed in all patients.

Results: The mean operating time was 204 minutes and the mean hospital stay was 8,8 days. The perioperative complications were one case with blood transfusion and one case with adjunctive incision infection. All patients had a neovagina with good vaginal orientation, lubrication and adequate length and breadth. Introital stenosis occurred in two women (1 month later). Five patients subsequently had intercourse and 3 women were satisfied with the surgery and subsequent sexual activity.

Conclusions: Laparoscopic simoid colon vaginoplasty is an effective methods of treatment of patients with MRKH syndrome. Both the anatomical and functional outcomes are satisfactory.

References

Vân Phụng Tống, Võ Minh Tuấn (2014), “Hội chứng Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser: Chẩn đoán và điều trị lâm sàng thành công bằng phương pháp Davydov tại BVTĐ Huế”, Tạp chí Y học Lâm sàng, 11, 1201-5.

Bombard J.L, Mousa S (2014), “Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome: complications, diagnosis and possible treatment options: a review”, Gynecological Endocrinology, 30(9), 618-23.

Cai B, Zhang J, Xi X, Yan Q, Wan X (2007), “Laparoscopically assisted sigmoid colon vaginoplasty in women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome: feasibility and short-term results”, BJOG, 114:1486-1492.

Darai E, Toullalan O, Besse O, Potiron L, Delga P (2003), “Anatomic and functional results of laparoscopic-perineal neovagina construction by sigmoid colpoplasty in women with Rokitansky’s syndrome”, Hum Reprod, 18:2454-9.

Djordjevic M.L, Stanojevic M.B, Biricik M.R (2011), “Rectosigmoid vaginoplasty: clinical experience and outcomes in 86 cases”, WJ, 8:3487-3494.

De Souza C, Lima A, Aspesi G, Meus A.L (2015), “Anatomic and functional results of rectosigmoid vaginoplasty in a consecutive series of 62 patients”, Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct, Mar 21 [Epub ahead of print].

Ismail S, Cutner AS, Creighton SM (2015), “Laparoscopic vaginoplasty: alternative techniques in vaginal reconstruction”, BJOG, 122(11), 340-3.

Kapoor R, Sharma DK, Singh KJ, Suri A, Singh P, Chaudhary H, Dubey D, Mandhani A (2006), “Sigmoid Vaginoplasty: Long-term results”, Urology, 67, 1212-1215.

Khen-Dunlop N, Lortat-Jacob S, Thibaud E, Clément-Ziza M, Yonne S, Nihoul-Fékété C (2007), “Rokitansky Syndrome: Clinical Experience and Results of Neovaginal Surgery in 23 Young Girls”, The Journal of Urology, 177, 1107-1111.

Kwun Kim S, Hoon Park J, Cheol Lee K, Min Park J, Tae Kim J, Chan Kim M (2003), “Long-term results in patients after rectosigmoid vaginoplasty”, Plastic Reconstructive Surgery, 112(1):143-51.

Labus LD, Djordjevic ML, Stanojevic MS (2011), “Rectosigmoid vaginoplasty in patients with vaginal agenesis: sexual and psychosocial outcomes”, Sex Health, 8, 427-30.

Lima M, Ruggeri G, Randi B, Domini M, Gargano T, Pergola E, Gregori G (2010), “Vaginal replacement in the pediatric age group: a 34-year experience of intestinal vaginoplasty in children and young girls”, Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 45, 827-832.

Morcel K, Camborieux L, Programme de Recherches sur les Aplasies Müllériennes (PRAM), Guerrier D. Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2007;2:13.

Mungadi I.A, Ahmad Y, Yunusa GH, Agwu NP, Ismail S (2010), “Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome: Surgical management of two cases”, Journal of Surgical Technique and Case Report, 2, 1-6.

O’Connor J, DeMarco R, Pope JV, Adams M, Brock III J (2004), “Bowel vaginoplasty in children: A retrospective review”, Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 39(8), 1205-1208.

Parsons JK, Gearhart SL, Gearhart JP (2002), “Vaginal reconstruction utilizing sigmoid colon: Complications and long-term results”, Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 37, 4, 629-633.

Patnaik S, Brazile B, Dandolu V, Ryan P, Liao J (2014), “Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuser-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome: A historical perspective”, Gene, 9, 045.

Pizzo A, Laganà A, Sturlese E, Retto G, Retto A (2014), “Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome: Embryology, genetics and clinical and surgical treatment”, ISRN Obstetrics and Gynecology, ID628717.

Rawat J, Ahmed I, Pandey A (2010), “Vaginal agenesis: Experience with sigmoid colon neovaginoplasty”, J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg, 15:19-22.

Urbanowicz W, Starzyk J, Sulislawski J (2004), “Laparoscopic vaginal reconstruction using a sigmoid colon segment: a preliminary report”, J Urol, 171:2632-5.

Published 25-12-2018
Fulltext
PDF (Tiếng Việt)     30    9
Language
Issue No. 52 (2018)
Section Original article
DOI
Keywords hội chứng Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser, phẫu thuật tạo hình âm đạo bằng đại tràng sigma nội soi Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome, laparoscopic simoid colon vaginoplasty

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Clinical Medicine Hue Central Hospital

Tran, T. A., Pham, A. V., Nguyen, M. T., Tran, H. M., & Nguyen, T. T. T. (2018). Laparoscopic sigmoid colon vaginoplasty in patients wih Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Journal of Clinical Medicine Hue Central Hospital, (52), 76–83. Retrieved from https://jcmhch.com.vn/index.php/home/article/view/1466