Downloads
Abstract
Purposes: Evaluating results of bipolar transurethral vaporization of the prostate in the treatment of
benign prostatic hyperplasia at Hue Central Hospital – Base 2
Subjects and Methods: Descriptive prospective and cross sectional study with 31 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia, who treated by bipolar transurethral vaporization of the prostate, at Department of
General Surgery, Hue Central Hospital – Base 2, from 12/2018 to 6/2019.
Results: Mean age: 73.66 ± 10.056 (56-103). Average prostate volume: 45.2ml. Pre-operation, IPSS
average >20 point, Mean PVR: 42ml. Operation time:52 (30-60) minutes. Intra-op. irrigant volume: 16
(12-20) litres. No statistical difference of serum Na+ concentration between pre- and postoperative value.
Cleaning continous bladder irrigation 24 hours post-operation are 19 patients, 48 hours post-operation are
12 patients. Catheterization time: 4 days. After catheter removed, acute urinary retention occurred in 2
patients, hematuria occurred in 10 patients, fever occurred in 5 patients, urinary incontinence occurred in
7 patients.
Conclusions: Bipolar transurethral vaporization of the prostate in the treatment of benign prostatic
hyperplasia is highly effective in improving symtoms of BOO and low accident and complication.
Keywords: Prostatic hyperplasia, vaporization of the prostate, bipolar transurethral vaporization of the
prostate in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.
References
Đỗ Ngọc Thể (2018), “Nghiên cứu ứng dụng
và đánh giá kết quả điều trị bệnh tăng sinh lành
tính tuyến tiền liệt bằng phương pháp bốc hơi
lưỡng cực qua nội soi niệu đạo”, Luận án Tin
sỹ Y hc. Học viện Quân y 103.
Kranzbühler .B, Wettstein .M.S, Fankhauser.
C.D, Grossmann .N.C, Gross .O, Poyet .C,
Largo. R, Fischer .B, Zimmermann .M , Sulser.
T (2013), “Pure bipolar plasma vaporization of
the prostate: the Zürich experience”, Journal of
endourology, 27 (10), pp. 1261-1266.
Dincel .C, Samli .M, Guler .C, Demirbas .M ,
Karalar .M (2004), “Plasma kinetic vaporization
of the prostate: clinical evaluation of a new
technique”, Journal of endourology, 18 (3), pp.
-298.
Otsuki .H, Kuwahara .Y, Kosaka .T, Tsukamoto.
T, Nakamura .K, Shiroki .R , Hoshinaga .K
(2012), “Transurethral resection in saline
vaporization: evaluation of clinical efficacy and
prostate volume”, Urology. 79 (3), pp. 665-669.
Botto. H, Lebret. T, Barré .P, Orsoni
.J.L, Hervé .J.M , Lugagne .P.M (2001),
“Electrovaporization of the prostate with the
Gyrus device”, Journal of endourology, 15 (3),
pp. 313-316.
Reich. O, Gratzke. C, Bachmann .A, Seitz.
M, Schlenker .B, Hermanek .P, Lack .N ,
Stief .C.G (2008), “Morbidity, mortality and
early outcome of transurethral resection of the
prostate: a prospective multicenter evaluation
of 10,654 patients”, The Journal of urology,
(1), pp. 246-249.
Falahatkar. S, Mokhtari. G, Moghaddam
.K.G, Et Al (2014), “Bipolar transurethral
vaporization: a superior procedure in benign
prostatic hyperplasia: a prospective randomized
comparison with bipolar TURP”, International
Brazilian Journal of Urology, 40 (3), pp. 346-
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Clinical Medicine Hue Central Hospital