Downloads
Abstract
Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (TLRH) has been reported since the early 1990 s. TLRH is technically feasible. Its operative safety profile is comparable to that of radical abdominal hysterectomy (RAH). The duration of the procedure has become acceptable but remains still longer in comparison to RAH. It is now evident that with increasing experience, repetition, standardization, and incorporation of technological advances, duration can be reduced considerably and become similar to that of RAH. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy is associated with less blood loss, faster recovery and return of bowel function, shorter hospitalization, and a better cosmetic result.
References
Abu-Rustum NR et al. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy using the argon-beam coagulator: pilot data and comparison to laparotomy. Gynecologic Oncology. 2003;91(2):402-9.
Bogani G et al. Laparoscopic versus open abdo- minal management of cervical cancer: long-term results from a propensity-matched analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21(5):857-62.
Chen Y et al. The outcome of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer: a prospective analysis of 295 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(10):2847-55.
Chong GO et al. Robot versus laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a comparison of the intraoperative and perioperative results of a single surgeon’s initial experience. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013;23(6):1145-9.
Ditto A et al. Implementation of laparoscopic approach for type B radical hysterectomy: a comparison with open surgical operations. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015;41(1):34-9.
Frumovitz M et al. Comparison of total laparoscopicandabdominalradicalhysterectomy for patients with earlystage cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(1):96-102.
Kong TW et al. Comparison of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy fornFIGO stage IB and IIA cervical cancer with tumor diameter of 3 cm or greater. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014;24(2):280-8.
Lee YS et al. Robot-assisted total preservation of the pelvic autonomic nerve with extended systematic lymphadenectomy as part of nervesparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013;23(6):1133-8.
Li G, Yan X, Shang H, Wang G, Chen L, Han Y. A comparison of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy and laparotomy in the treatment of Ib-IIa cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;105(1):176–80.
Lim YK, Chia YN, Yam KL. Total laparoscopic Wertheim’s radical hysterectomy versus Wertheim’s radical abdominal hysterectomy in the management of stage I cervical cancer in Singapore: a pilot study. Singapore Med J. 2013;54(12):683–8.
Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Deutsche Krebshilfe, AWMF). S3-Leitlinie diagnostik, therapie und nachsorge der patientin mit zervixkarzinom, Langversion 1.0. 2014.
Malzoni M et al. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: our experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(5):1316-23.
National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®). Cervical Cancer. Version 1.2014. 2014.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer. NICE interventional procedure guidance [IPG338]. 2010.
Nam JH et al. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in earlystage cervical cancer: long-term survival outcomes in a matched cohort study. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(4):903-11.
Park JY et al. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB2 and IIA2 cervical cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2013;108(1):63-9.
Pellegrino A, Villa A, Fruscio R, Signorelli M, Meroni MG, Iedà N, Vitobello D: Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in early-stage cervical cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 18: 474-478, 2008.
Puntambekar SP et al. Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy made easy by laparoscopy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21(5):732.
Puntambekar SP et al. Laparoscopic total radical hysterectomy by the Pune technique: our experience of 248 cases. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14(6): 682-9.
Puntambekar SP, Palep RJ, Puntambekar SS. Laparoscopic total radical hysterectomy by the Pune technique: Our experience of 248 cases. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14: 682-689, 2007.
Querleu, D, Leblanc, E. Laparoscopic surgery for gynecologic oncology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol.2003;15:309–314.
Ramirez PT et al. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;102(2):252-5.
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Management of cervical cancer: A national clinical guideline. 2008.
Spirtos NM, Eisenkop SM, Schlaerth JB, Ballon SC. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type III) with aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with stage I cervical cancer: Surgical morbidity and intermediate follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187: 340-348, 2002.
Taylor SE et al. Radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: laparoscopy versus laparotomy. JSLS. 2011;15(2):213-7.
Toptas T, Simsek T. Total laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in stage IA2-IB1 cervical cancer: disease recurrence and survival comparison. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014;24(6):373-8.
van de Lande J. Open versus laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in early stage cervical cancer: no difference in surgical or disease outcome. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012;22(1):107-14.
Wertheim E, Die Erweiterte abdominale Operation bei Carcinoma colli uteri (1911), Berlin.
Wright JD et al. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;127(1):11-7.
Yan-zhou Wang, Li Deng, Hui-cheng Xu, Yao Zhang, Zhi-qing Liang. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage cervical cancer.BMC Cancer2015.
Zakashansky K et al. A casecontrolled study of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy in a fellowship training program. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007;17(5):1075-82.
Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Ciravolo G, Volpi E, Uccella S, Rampinelli F, et al. Surgicopdthologic outcome of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;106(3):502–6.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Clinical Medicine Hue Central Hospital