Outcomes of dual-mobility cup for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly

Tải xuống

Dữ liệu tải xuống chưa có sẵn.
PDF (English)     6    3

Tóm tắt

Background: Femoral neck fracture (FNF) is a common intracapsular fracture in the elderly as a result of osteoporosis, which tends to increase with humans’ extended longevity. Regarding treatment for undisplaced FNF, internal fixation is mostly used, while primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) is used for older patients with displaced FNF because of the high rate of avascular necrosis and nonunion. THA shows a better functional result than internal fixation in treating FNF; however, dislocation is still a severe complication. Recently, the dual mobility cup (DMC) has become more and more popular as a solution to reduce dislocation. The purpose of this research is to evaluate the outcome of dual-mobility cups for FNF in the elderly.

Methods: A retrospective study was carried out on 164 patients who had THA by means of a dual moblity cup and posterolateral approach in Hue Central Hospital from January 2018 to April 2023. Medical history, clinical and paraclinical features, and the modified Harris Hip Score (MHHS) were assessed. TraumaCad® software was used to measure the figures of hip prostheses.

Results: One hundred and sixty-four patients with a mean age of seventy-five years were followed up from 6 to 64 months. More than 90% of patients had osteopenia and osteoporosis according to bone mineral density. The average figures include length of incision (7,4 cm), operation duration (66,4 minutes), blood loss volume (664,6 ml), discrepancy of leg length under 10mm (97%); size of prothesis: shell (49,1mm), stem (11,6mm), head with short neck (90,2%). Radiological assessment showed that the mean abduction angle and anteversion angle were 48,1° ± 5,4° and 20.1° ± 5,6° respectively. There were four intraoperative calcar fractures (2,4%), three periprosthetic fractures (1,8%), no hip dislocation, no aseptic loosening and no infection. The overall MHHS was 92,1 ± 7.

Conclusion: DMC is an alternative option to prevent dislocation and give good outcomes to elderly patients with FNF. Longer follow-up duration may have revealed complications of DMC.

https://doi.org/10.38103/jcmhch.92.16

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bellova P, Goronzy J, Riedel R, Grothe T, Hartmann A, Gunther KP. Dual-Mobility Cups in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty. Z Orthop Unfall. 2023;161(1):74-84.

Dennison E, Mohamed MA, Cooper C. Epidemiology of osteoporosis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2006;32(4):617-29.

Tidermark J, Ponzer S, Svensson O, Soderqvist A, Tornkvist H. Internal fixation compared with total hip replacement for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly. A randomised, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85(3):380-8.

Lu-Yao GL, Keller RB, Littenberg B, Wennberg JE. Outcomes after displaced fractures of the femoral neck. A meta-analysis of one hundred and six published reports. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76(1):15-25.

Wang F, Zhang H, Zhang Z, Ma C, Feng X. Comparison of bipolar hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in the healthy elderly: a meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16229.

Hopley C, Stengel D, Ekkernkamp A, Wich M. Primary total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular hip fractures in older patients: systematic review. BMJ. 2010;340c2332.

Xu F. KR, Gu Y., Qi W. . Bipolar hemiarthroplasty vs. total hip replacement in elderly. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2017;107911-7920.

Iorio R, Healy WL, Lemos DW, Appleby D, Lucchesi CA, Saleh KJ. Displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly: outcomes and cost effectiveness. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001(383):229-42.

Adam P, Philippe R, Ehlinger M, Roche O, Bonnomet F, Mole D, et al. Dual mobility cups hip arthroplasty as a treatment for displaced fracture of the femoral neck in the elderly. A prospective, systematic, multicenter study with specific focus on postoperative dislocation. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012;98(3):296-300.

Tarasevicius S, Busevicius M, Robertsson O, Wingstrand H. Dual mobility cup reduces dislocation rate after arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11175.

De Martino I, Triantafyllopoulos GK, Sculco PK, Sculco TP. Dual mobility cups in total hip arthroplasty. World J Orthop. 2014;5(3):180-7.

Noyer D , Caton JH. Once upon a time.... Dual mobility: history. Int Orthop. 2017;41(3):611-618.

Robinson PM, Harrison T, Cook A, Parker MJ. Orthopaedic injuries associated with hip fractures in those aged over 60 years: a study of patterns of injury and outcomes for 1971 patients. Injury. 2012;43(7):1131-4.

Tornetta III P. RWM, Ostrum R.F., McQueen M.M., McKee M.D., Court-Brown C.M., Rockwood and Green’s Fracture in Adults. 2020. 3578-3664.

Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC, Browner W, Cauley J, Ensrud K, et al. Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Lancet. 1993;341(8837):72-5.

Bigoni M, Turati M, Leone G, Caminita AD, D’Angelo F, Munegato D, et al. Internal fixation of intracapsular femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: mortality and reoperation rate. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020;32(6):1173-1178.

Chang JD, Kim IS, Lee SS, Yoo JH, Hwang JH. Unstable intertrochanteric versus displaced femoral neck fractures treated with cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients; a comparison of 80 matched patients. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016;102(6):695-9.

Lehtonen EJI, Stibolt RD, Jr., Smith W, Wills B, Pinto MC, McGwin G, Jr., et al. Trends in surgical treatment of femoral neck fractures in the elderly. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2018;16(3):eAO4351.

Bordes M, Viste A, Fauvernier M, Mercier M, Chaudier P, Severyns M, et al. Outcomes and survival of a modern dual mobility cup and uncemented collared stem in displaced femoral neck fractures at a minimum 5-year follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2022;108(1):103164.

Ait Mokhtar M. Postero-posterolateral approach in total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2020;44(12):2577-2585.

Jacquot F, Ait Mokhtar M, Sautet A, Doursounian L, Masquelet AC, Feron JM. The mini postero-posterolateral mini incision in total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2013;37(10):1891-5.

Macaulay W, Nellans KW, Iorio R, Garvin KL, Healy WL, Rosenwasser MP, et al. Total hip arthroplasty is less painful at 12 months compared with hemiarthroplasty in treatment of displaced femoral neck fracture. HSS J. 2008;4(1):48-54.

Wani IH, Sharma S, Latoo I, Salaria AQ, Farooq M, Jan M. Primary total hip arthroplasty versus internal fixation in displaced fracture of femoral neck in sexa- and septuagenarians. J Orthop Traumatol. 2014;15(3):209-14.

Assi CC, Barakat HB, Caton JH, Najjar EN, Samaha CT, Yammine KF. Mortality Rate and Mid-Term Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Dual Mobility Cups for the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures in a Middle Eastern Population. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34(2):333-337.

Ukaj S, Zhuri O, Ukaj F, Podvorica V, Grezda K, Caton J, et al. Dual Mobility Acetabular Cup Versus Hemiarthroplasty in Treatment of Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures in Elderly Patients: Comparative Study and Results at Minimum 3-Year Follow-up. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2019;102151459319848610.

Dorr LD, Maheshwari AV, Long WT, Wan Z, Sirianni LE. Early pain relief and function after posterior minimally invasive and conventional total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, blinded study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(6):1153-60.

Murphy WS, Yun HH, Hayden B, Kowal JH, Murphy SB. The Safe Zone Range for Cup Anteversion Is Narrower Than for Inclination in THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018;476(2):325-335.

Reina N, Putman S, Desmarchelier R, Sari Ali E, Chiron P, Ollivier M, et al. Can a target zone safer than Lewinnek’s safe zone be defined to prevent instability of total hip arthroplasties? Case-control study of 56 dislocated THA and 93 matched controls. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017;103(5):657-661.

Thurig G, Schmitt JW, Slankamenac K, Werner CM. Safety of total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures using the direct anterior approach: a retrospective observational study in 86 elderly patients. Patient Saf Surg. 2016;1012.

El Bitar YF, Stone JC, Jackson TJ, Lindner D, Stake CE, Domb BG. Leg-Length Discrepancy After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Comparison of Robot-Assisted Posterior, Fluoroscopy-Guided Anterior, and Conventional Posterior Approaches. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2015;44(6):265-9.

Ishii S, Homma Y, Baba T, Jinnai Y, Zhuang X, Tanabe H, et al. Does total hip arthroplasty via the direct anterior approach using dual mobility increase leg length discrepancy compared with single mobility? Arthroplasty. 2021;3(1):2.

Franklin J , Malchau H. Risk factors for periprosthetic femoral fracture. Injury. 2007;38(6):655-60.

Berry DJ. Epidemiology: hip and knee. Orthop Clin North Am. 1999;30(2):183-90.

Marsland D , Mears SC. A review of periprosthetic femoral fractures associated with total hip arthroplasty. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2012;3(3):107-20.

Sarvilinna R, Huhtala HS, Sovelius RT, Halonen PJ, Nevalainen JK, Pajamaki KJ. Factors predisposing to periprosthetic fracture after hip arthroplasty: a case (n = 31)-control study. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75(1):16-20.

Lindahl H, Malchau H, Herberts P, Garellick G. Periprosthetic femoral fractures classification and demographics of 1049 periprosthetic femoral fractures from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20(7):857-65.

Đã xuất bản 26-12-2024
Toàn văn
PDF (English)     6    3
Ngôn ngữ
Số tạp chí Số 92 (2023)
Phân mục Nghiên cứu
DOI 10.38103/jcmhch.92.16
Từ khóa Femoral neck fracture, dual mobility cup, total hip arthroplasty, American Society of Anesthesiology, modified Harris Hip Score.

Creative Commons License

công trình này được cấp phép theo Creative Commons Attribution-phi thương mại-NoDerivatives 4.0 License International .

Bản quyền (c) 2023 Tạp chí Y học lâm sàng Bệnh viện Trung Ương Huế

Dat, N. M., Nhan, L. N. T., Bao, N. N. T., & Hy, N. V. (2024). Outcomes of dual-mobility cup for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly . Tạp Chí Y học lâm sàng Bệnh viện Trung Ương Huế, (92), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.38103/jcmhch.92.16